Yes, I was wondering the same thing David. I can’t recall the last time I worked on a 32 bit machine.

 

Regards,

 

Greg

 

Dr Greg Low

 

1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile

SQL Down Under | Web: https://sqldownunder.com | About Greg:  https://about.me/greg.low

 

From: David Kean via ozdotnet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2022 3:13 PM
To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Cc: Greg Keogh <gfkeogh@gmail.com>; David Kean <David.Kean@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: Platform x64 argument

 

Do you actually support/ship your app to run on x86-only or ARM environments? If not, it probably doesn’t matter and I would probably give this one and save the battles for other things.

 

From: Greg Keogh via ozdotnet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 9:46 AM
To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Cc: Greg Keogh <gfkeogh@gmail.com>
Subject: Platform x64 argument

 

Folks, one of my colleagues insists on compiling everything as platform x64 mainly because he thinks "it's an x64 world and it creates a better impression". For a year I've tried to convince him that for managed code that it's a complete waste of time. I've told him that ildasm.exe shows that for x64 and AnyCPU the generated IL and the manifests are identical, I even told him that dumpbin.exe shows the only non trivial difference in the PE headers is a couple of flags that show x86/x64 and PE32/PE32+, but they don't affect the loading and running of a PE containing IL and metadata.

 

Does anyone have paradigm-shattering evidence I can give my colleague to break his habit? (I'm hoping I'm right of course!!)

 

Greg

--
ozdotnet mailing list
To manage your subscription, access archives: https://codify.mailman3.com/